пятница, 23 марта 2018 г.



1)   The mechanism of action of lenses.
Let's get down to explaining the functioning of the device, which occupies an important place in the life of many people. As you know, glasses correct the process of visual perception in people with impaired vision. The glasses use different types of lenses. They - the lenses - are devices that change the trajectory of the movement of light rays - that is, refracting them.
We do not want to get ahead of ourselves greatly, however, it should be recalled that in the book devoted to the mechanics of elementary particles ("Ethereal mechanics") we paid much attention to the causes and mechanism of changing the trajectory of moving particles. And the main reasons for the change in the trajectory, if you remember, were called the Fields of Attraction and Repulsion.  So, in this article we will only try to apply in concrete ways the processes that we have already discovered.
In addition to glasses there are many other types of optical instruments, where a person uses lenses - magnifier, binoculars, telescope, microscope… These are the most basic.
Our eyes - is also a kind of optical devices. And, as befits such devices, they have in their composition lenses - crystalline lens. Inside the eye, or rather, inside the ciliary body there are muscles that control the shape of the crystalline lens - increase or decrease its curvature. These muscles are called – accommodative, since the change in the shape of the crystalline lens is an act of accommodation (adaptation). These muscles are connected with the crystalline lens with the help of the zinn ligaments. When the muscle is relaxed, the distance between it and the crystalline lens increases and the ligaments are stretched - the curvature of the lens decreases. I.e. the crystalline lens (lens) becomes more elongated, more flat. Muscles relax - it decreases its distance to the crystalline lens, and as a result - the tension of the zinn ligaments is weakened. As a result, the curvature of the crystalline lens increases, since the relaxed ligaments do not stretch it.
Conventional lenses, made of glass, it can be any shape - and convex (light collecting), and concave (dissipating). Light collecting lenses convert a parallel beam of light rays into a converging beam. Dissipating lenses, on the contrary, transform a parallel beam into a divergent one. The crystalline lens is an example of a light collecting lens. The degree of convexity or concavity can be any, including a very small, tending to zero. But it will still exist.
Optical devices use lenses of all kinds - convex, concave, convex-concave, biconvex and biconcave. Herewith the curvature of both surfaces of the lens can be any – it all depends on the specific tasks, which are sought to achieve with this device.
Why do we need different curvature - and the crystalline lens, and glass lenses? And how does this affect the features of the resulting image (ie, passed through it)?
To answer these and other questions, we need to recall the experiments of I. Newton with glass prisms, with which he decomposed white light into the spectrum. Why do we need this?
The thing is that when light passes (photons of the visible range) through the lens, happens to them is the same as when they pass through the prism. Photons (like any other energy units of the universe) are deflected under the action of the total Attraction Field of the lens material. Just as they were rejected in the experiments of I. Newton under the action of the total Field of Attraction of the substance of the prism.
Accordingly, it is not difficult to conclude that the total Field of Attraction from those parts of the lens (or prism), where the thickness of the substance is greater, will also be larger. Therefore, in the experiment of I. Newton photons are displaced (refracted) namely in the direction of the base of the prism not to the top. The same process we can observe in the lens - where the substances are larger - light rays are deflected (refracted) there.
If the lens is convex, then there will be more substance along its axis (toward the center) than along the edges.
The thickening along the axis of the lens can be negligible. However, even if it is so, it still exists. And the attraction from the central part of the lens will be at least not much, but more than from the edges.
If the lens is concave, then at the edges the thickness of the substance will be greater than in the region of the lens axis.
And in this case, the attraction from the substance of the edges is greater than the attraction of the central area of the lens.
That is why a convex (collecting) lens deflects photons (and any other particles) closer to the center of its axis, and a concave (dissipative) - closer to the edges. And because the image "passed" through a convex lens, is reduced in size. And the rays after such a lens converge at one point earlier than if they had not passed through it.
The image "passed" through a concave lens, on the other hand, expands, increases, since photons of light rays are attracted by the edges and deviate in their direction.
2) Reason for accommodation. Myopia and hyperopia.
And now let us turn to the reasons of accommodation and the issue of correcting myopia and hyperopia. Let's start with the second point.
Please note, in this part of the article we will first give the known facts concerning the explanation of the causes of these visual impairments. Therefore, those who know these facts can become bored. Take your time. After that, we promise you interesting conclusions on this issue. 
Both nearsightedness and farsightedness are eye diseases caused by changes in the accommodative muscle that controls the magnitude of curvature of the lens. As already mentioned, this muscle is located in the thickness of the ciliary body. The ligaments lead from the muscle to the crystalline lens. When the muscle is relaxed, it is farther from the crystalline lens and ligaments are stretched. So, the crystalline lens is flattened (its curvature is less). In contrast, when the muscle contracts, it is compressed and close to the crystalline lens. Accordingly, the tension of the ligaments decreases, and the crystalline lens becomes more round (ie its curvature increases).
So, the short-sightedness is a strengthening of the functional activity of the accommodative muscles due to the peculiarities of the (life) and heredity. The strain of the eye, associated with attempts to see something at close range, increases myopia. With myopia, the muscle gets used to being in a tense, shortened state. Working conditions do not stimulate myopic people to turn their gaze into the distance. They are constantly looking at something near. Such people either read a lot, or are engaged in "jewelry" work.
When the crystalline lens is not stretched, the thickness of the substance increases in the central part of this lens. Therefore, the total Field of Attraction from this region increases. And photons are attracted and deviate to the central part of the crystalline lens to a greater extent than with the less its curvature.
A person with hyperopia, on the contrary, sees better in the distance than near. Hyperopia develops when the functional activity of the accommodative muscle is weakened. It is poorly contracted, and because of this, the ligaments stretch the crystalline lens even when they should not do this.
In the central part of the crystalline lens, the thickness of the substance decreases, when this lens expands. So, the total Field of Attraction from the side of this area decreases. And photons are attracted and deviate to the central part of the crystalline lens less than when the curvature of the crystalline lens was larger.
Hyperopia is common vision pathology in the elderly. And it is due to the general weakening in the senile organism of the functional activity of all muscle groups.

And now an interesting observation promised at the beginning of this part of the article.
Let's think about the next question. Why does the crystalline lens in general need to distinguish between light rays coming from different distances? Why does the crystalline lens need to be constantly readjusted depending on whether the person (or animal) is looking into the distance, or looks at the bodies near? After all, it would seem that the light rays are everywhere the same. At least, this is what modern science affirms. The speed of light is regarded as a constant value. Therefore, the speed of light rays coming into the eye from afar and from a close distance, in accordance with the statements of modern scientists, will be the same. And the color composition of the waves is the same.
Then why do we need accommodation? Why the crystalline lens with the same form can’t equally well meet and bring to the retina both the far rays, and the near rays? Why do we need this permanent changeover?
Science neatly ignores this question. Herewith, it is believed that the phenomenon of accommodation is disclosed in detail. In this case, once again we can be convinced that science is often limited to ascertaining and describing the consequences leaving the causes of the phenomena without the necessary attention.
The human body is a clever mechanism that is constantly busy, adjusting itself to the surrounding conditions. And the adjustment of the crystalline lens is one such example.
Let's get down to explaining the reasons of accommodation. And this reason is quite simple.
Light rays are not at all the same in speed, as is commonly assumed. The speed of light is not constant. Of course, the difference in the speed of light rays can be so insignificant that it is neglected in measurements. But the organism does not neglect. It defines the slightest difference in the speed of light rays and accordingly readjusts the crystalline lens.
If you remember, when we talked about the inertial motion of elementary particles, we found out that the Yin particles move with gradual deceleration, while the particles Yang - with gradual acceleration. However, if there are particles of both types in the light beam, there will be a redistribution of energy. As a result, Yin particles are accelerating, and Yang are decelerating. And all of the particles move in a stream with a certain uniform total rate. 
In addition, photons of light, about which we are talking – these are particles of the upper levels of the Physical Plane. These levels are the so-called ethereal subplanes of the Physical Plane. The percentage of Yin particles is larger among the particles of the Physical Plane. Particles Yang best of all are emitted and reflected by chemical elements. As part of the Physical Plane, Yang are particles of red color. However, such particles make up only 1/3 of all the particles. Others Yin. As a result, in the composition of any light ray, most of the particles are yellow. They possess the Field of Attraction. But still its magnitude is much smaller than that of blue particles. Therefore, yellow ones are emitted or reflected (when heated or collided) much better than blue ones. This was said in order to make it clear that the light rays of the Physical Plane necessarily slow down over time.
From this we can draw a simple conclusion. The speed of the rays emitted earlier is less than the speed of the rays emitted later. Of course, provided that the chemical composition and temperature of the bodies emitting and reflecting light are everywhere approximately the same. We can formulate this rule a little differently. The speed of the rays that have traveled a greater distance is less than the speed of the rays that have traveled a smaller path.
And from this conclusion it follows that the light rays entering the eye from a short distance are characterized by a greater speed than the more distant light rays.
But this is not the end of the explanation. What relation does the speed of light rays have to the curvature of the crystalline lens?
To begin with, there are two types of photoreceptors in the retina of the human and animal eyes: rods and cones. The cones, in contrast to the rods, perform a more detailed analysis of the image. We can say that they are responsible for the sharpness, clarity of perception of all the details. Rods, rather, perceive a common image, silhouette, without distinguishing individual small details.
In most of the daytime animals and in humans, the cones are located in the central part of the retina. The central fossa of the yellow spot consists only of cones. At the same time, on the periphery of the retina, the rods predominate numerically over the cones.
This is the first.
The second. In the second book, devoted to the Mechanics of Elementary Particles (“Ethereal mechanics”), we paid much attention to the features of the action on elementary particles of various Forces, including their simultaneous action.
When a photon of light, moving by inertia, enters the crystalline lens, its trajectory is refracted towards the central part of this eye lens, since the crystalline lens is a biconvex lens, and in its central part the amount of substance is larger (and, hence, the total Field of Attraction is lager).  The greater the curvature, the greater the thickness of the lens (ie the greater the amount of the substance along the axis), and the greater the angle of deflection of the light rays.
If you remember, the inertial motion of photons occurs for the reason that in each photon there is the Force of Inertia. This Force of Inertia is the ether emitted by the posterior hemisphere and forcing the particle to move forward. The Inertia Force competes in a photon with the Force of Attraction on the part of the crystalline lens material. In accordance with the Rule of Parallelogram. As a result, the photon changes the direction of motion. And its new trajectory will coincide with the direction of the vector of the resulting Force. The greater the Force of Inertia, the greater the particle velocity. This means that the Force of Inertia is greater in faster light rays. And, accordingly, the greater the Force of Inertia, the greater the Force of Attraction in order to "balance" the Force of Inertia.
And how to do it and what is it for? 
To do this simply - increasing the curvature of the crystalline lens. The greater the curvature, the greater the Force of Attraction. This allows you to deflect to the desired angle of light rays with greater speed. On the contrary, the small curvature is suitable for slower rays, in which the magnitude of the Inertia Force is smaller.
But why is this done? Why should the angle of refraction be constant? The reason for this was called when we talked about cones and rods. Most of the cones are in the central part of the eye. But it is the cones that are responsible for the detailed examination of bodies.
That is why a normal organism always tends to maintain the same angle of refraction of light rays by changing the shape of the crystalline lens. This is the reason for the existence of accommodation.
And now we will find out what happens to the light rays in the near-sighted and far-sighted crystalline lens.
The short-sighted crystalline lens, due to the lack of contractile activity of the accommodative muscle, weakly reacts to the desire of the organism to see something in the distance. With myopia, the curvature of the crystalline lens is too large to "match" photons that have traveled a greater distance and whose Force of Inertia is weakened to a greater extent. The large Force of Attraction of the near-sighted crystalline lens (with greater curvature) is designed for a large Inertia Force of photons at close range. And photons with a small Force of Inertia under the influence of such a large Force of Attraction are refracted to a larger angle than is necessary in order to reach the yellow spot.

As a result, photons passing through the crystalline lens closer to the periphery, being refracted, fall on the periphery of the retina, where rods predominate. As a result, more than necessary, photons passing through the crystalline lens (except for those whose path of motion coincides with the axis of the lens), refracting, falls on the periphery of the retina, where the rods predominate, and not in the region closer to the center (where the cones are). It is because of this that the sharpness of the perceived image decreases. Because of this short-sighted people see not clearly the bodies in the distance. However, removing tension from the eyes, resting and looking at the bodies in the distance, they have the opportunity to improve their vision.
With farsightedness, everything is exactly the opposite.
The weakness of the accommodative muscle leads to excessive flattening of the crystalline lens. With farsightedness, the crystalline lens does not respond well enough to the desire of the body to see anything near. The accommodative muscle must contract to relax the cinnamon ligaments and thereby increase the curvature of the crystalline lens. This does not happen, and the lens remains flattened. As a result, photons coming into the eye from a close distance, and therefore possessing a greater Force of Inertia, are refracted by an angle less than what is needed. And therefore they too are closer to the periphery of the retina, and not to its center. The word "too" is used because, with myopia, photons also find themselves closer to the periphery. The small Attraction Force of the far-sighted crystalline lens is designed for photons that came from a distance and therefore possess a smaller Inertia Force.
So, as you can see, even in the case of myopia, the photons are closer to the periphery of the retina (how much closer it depends on the severity of myopia), and with farsightedness. With the only difference is that with myopia, after refraction, they fall on the side of the retina opposite to the side of the crystalline lens through which they passed. While with farsightedness, the photons are on the same side of the retina as the side of the crystalline lens through which they enter the retina. But this applies only to those photons that do not "match" the curvature of the crystalline lens. Distant photons will be the "inappropriate" photons with myopia and hyperopia with - neighbors. "Suitable" photons - nears for nearsightedness and distant with farsightedness will be refracted to the desired angle, and fall into the central region of the retina.

четверг, 11 января 2018 г.



The acquired shine appears in solids during their friction against each other.
In the process of friction the bodies are squeezed and moved relative to each other.  Even a perfectly flat surface of the body is not really that. Chemical elements protrude above the surface of the body.  And the chemical elements themselves are spheres. Therefore in the composition of surface chemical elements the particles of peripheral layers protrude most of all. In bodies squeezed and moved relative to each other peripheral particles in the composition of the surface protruding elements collide with each other. Or the protruding elements themselves collide even entirely. In any case, colliding particles or elements force each other to leave the bodies, in the composition of which they are included. And as always in collisions particles leave the composition of elements and the elements - the composition of the bodies either by submitting to the Force of Pressure, or by ether transformation emitted by particles with repulsion fields in the inertially moving elements of bodies.
The greater the speed of movement of rubbing bodies, the greater the magnitude of the Pressure Forces and also the Forces of Inertia (which strengthens the degree of transformation).  If the magnitude of these Forces is greater than the magnitude of the Attraction Force retaining the particles in the composition of the elements and the elements in the composition of the body, so there is a separation either of the peripheral particles from the surface elements or of the surface elements from the body. Separation of surface chemical elements is a partial destruction of the body. So usually there occurs an alignment of the friction surfaces. Separation of peripheral particles is their emission. Ie in the process of friction the surface chemical elements of rubbing bodies emit the 2nd component of heat - elementary particles.
The loss of peripheral particles by the surface elements of rubbing bodies "denudes" deeper layers of particles in these elements. And the deeper inside the chemical elements, the larger the magnitude of the attraction fields of particles located there. As a result, the magnitude of the element's Attraction Field manifesting outward increases in those areas of chemical elements, where they lost part of the peripheral particles.  
As a result, in those zones of chemical elements, where their deep layers are bare, more number of free particles begins to accumulate, particles with repulsion fields are better hold. And in the end, there occurs an "etheric shield" in the form of ether emitted by particles. This enhances the reflectivity of the body in that place, where friction was produced. And as a consequence there occurs shine .
Rubbing bodies, unless they had a metallic shine or were transparent, must necessarily have this or that color. As already mentioned in the paragraph on color the presence of color means that a sufficient number of optical photons is contained on the periphery of the elements of a given body forming in aggregate one or another color, which manifested itself in the process of their emission in response to the fall of elementary particles moving from the sources of "light".
In the process of friction, optical photons of surface elements are in one way or another "erased” – ie are emitted during collisions. As a result, in those zones of chemical elements, where they lose optical photons, which formed the color of the elements, Fields of Attraction of elements increases and there is a process of accumulation of free particles (which have 100% solar origin). Partial or total loss of optical photons causes a loss of color in the surface elements of rubbing bodies. But only in places of their collisions. In the same places, the Fields of Attraction of elements increase (or they appear) and the accumulation of free particles. And this leads to the reflection of the falling "light" (optical photons). That's what it is - the emergence of the acquired metallic luster in rubbing bodies.
However, as we can see from experience rubbing bodies do not completely lose their color. They preserve it along with the appearance of brilliance. Why is it so?
The preservation of color is due to the fact that surface chemical elements only partially lose optical photons. There is a loss of optical photons (and other particles) only in those areas of chemical elements that collide. And those areas of elements that do not collide do not lose particles. Besides only the most protruding elements above the surfaces of rubbing bodies lose optical photons. So there is the preservation of the color inherent in the bodies.
As you understand, in order to acquired shine began to form in the rubbing bodies the surfaces of rubbing bodies should be smooth. Otherwise, pre-destruction will occur, chipping away parts of rubbing bodies until the surfaces are leveled.
Apart from this if the value of the repulsion forces arising in particles of colliding elements will exceed the force of attraction between the elements, which preserve connections between them, the destruction of rubbing bodies can occur. The greater the pressure exerted by the rubbing bodies on each other, the more the layers of surface elements penetrate each other, and the more the number of collisions increases. The greater the number of surface elements comes off. If the pressure is not large, then the number of leaving elements is much smaller.
Thus, it is a small pressure – ie surface friction - leads not to the detachment of elements, but to the detachment of particles, and the appearance of the acquired shine .
The greater the speed of movement of rubbing bodies relative to each other,  the greater is the magnitude of the repulsion forces, which leads to the fact that in a unit of time the surface elements of rubbing bodies will lose more particles. Accordingly, the acquired shine will appear faster and will be stronger.
If rubbing bodies were transparent (or one of them), then in the process of friction (grinding) they do not lose transparency. But in addition to it they acquire shine . This phenomenon we can observe in the example of all kinds of polished precious and semiprecious stones or simply of transparent plastics.  
Gases and liquids can not get the acquired shine. This is explained by the fact that the Forces of Attraction linking individual elements or elements of different molecules are small in comparison with the Repulsive Forces arising from friction. As a result, the shape of bodies in the liquid or gaseous state under pressure is easily deformed - ie elements move by the action of collision against each other. This does not contribute to the emergence of "denudation" of deep layers in the composition of surface elements. As a result, the acquired shine can not arise.

вторник, 22 августа 2017 г.



The reasons for gloss of substances, as in the case of the color of substances, are:
1) qualitative and quantitative composition of chemical elements of the substance;
2) quality of particles bombarding elements;
Gloss is an optical property:
1) either originally inherent to the chemical elements of the substance – appeared together with the emergence of these elements;
2) or acquired by friction caused by another substance that has strong chemical bonds.
Let's consider successively both cases of existence of the gloss. At first - inherent, then – acquired.
Gloss is inherent in elements, which manifest metallic properties.
The metallic properties of chemical elements are due Are caused by the manifestation outward of the total Field of Attraction, but not the Field of Repulsion.  And the more its magnitude - the Field of Attraction, the stronger the metallic properties of the element.
The more particles with the gravitational field in the chemical element, the larger its total Field of Attraction.  However, this does not mean that this element will have the manifested externally Field Attraction. After all, if for example the particles with repulsion fields will prevail in its peripheral layers, so they, in this way, will shield the Field of Attraction of the Element core. And as a result, not a Field of Attraction, but a Repulsion Field can manifest itself outward from such an element.
Elements-metals, unlike nonmetallic elements, continue to build their "body" constantly at any opportunity. Thanks to the Fields of Attraction existing in metal elements free elementary particles of any quality, which find themselves in a coverage area of these Fields, they are attracted to such elements. Attracted free elementary particles accumulate in the intervals between the elements and on the surface of the metallic body. 
Accumulation of optical photons of any type in the composition of a substance, consisting of metal elements, just leads to the appearance of characteristic metallic gloss. The mechanism of its occurrence is explained as follows.
Those surfaces of chemical elements of substance, which do not participate in the formation of chemical bonds with each other, usually reflect "light" (and other elementary particles). And of course first of all, these are chemical elements on the surface of a body containing metal elements. Moreover, not only optical photons accumulate, and elementary particles of any quality that fall within the zone of action of the gravitational field of the substance. For example, infrared or radio photons. Herewith the particles with the gravitational fields are attracted best of all, since they in contrast to particles with a repulsion field do not create a repulsive force in relation to a chemical element.
However, the main role in the appearance of metallic gloss is played by elementary particles with repulsion fields. 
Elements-metals, unlike nonmetallic elements, due to the large magnitude of the Fields of Attraction have a remarkable ability to accumulate not only free particles with the fields of attraction, but also particles with repulsion fields. Particles with Repulsion Fields create a Repulsion Force in the particles to be contacted. However, it is due to the large force of attraction caused by the elements of metals the repulsive force of particles Yang does not cause them to move away from these elements. So they are withheld in their composition.
Here it is necessary to remind that the particles with repulsion fields predominate in the composition of the radiation of any celestial body (for example, the Sun). Herewith, the number of particles, belonging to the radio and infrared ranges, is the largest. 
So, the particles with repulsion fields mainly of the radio and infrared ranges accumulating on the surface of metal elements create a kind of "protective layer" in the form of ether emitted by particles (this is the ether of the Repulsion Fields). 
Thus, the accumulation on the surface of the metal elements the particles with repulsion fields leads to the fact that the falling on the element particles are poorly absorbed and almost completely reflected (repelled). We perceive reflection in the unchanged qualitative and quantitative composition of the falling optical photons as metalic glosser.
And, pay attention. Due to the fact that the elements of metals have large fields of attraction accumulated by them on the surface of free particles, which are responsible for the increased reflectivity of metals, when colliding with them of falling photons are not emitted themselves. Ie they remain in the chemical element. That is why gloss of many metals has the mirrored character. This means that they do not add to the reflected light beam the emitted ray. If, however, the reflected beam is added to the emitted ray - ie accumulated free particles are also emitted in a significant amount, then it is no longer a question of glosser, but of the white color of a chemical element.
As is known, there are many types of chemical elements of metals. They differ from each other in the magnitude of their Fields of Attraction. Those of them, whose Fields of Attraction are not so large, will not have a mirror shine. Instead, there will be a dull sheen, somewhere close to white color. And all this is due to the fact that these elements emit a lot of their own accumulated free particles.
Not only optical photons may be reflected. Reflection of IR and radio photons occurs even better because they absorb less ether in a unit of time. And, consequently, the force of attraction that arises in them with respect to the element is less. It is known, for example, that metals reflect the predominant number of IR and radio photons falling on them. Radio photons are reflected by metals in a greater degree compared to IR photons. The last property - the reflection of radio-photons - is the basis for receiving of radio and television broadcasts.

среда, 5 июля 2017 г.


As is known from experience, at low intensity of the falling "light" (at twilight) all the colored substances acquire a dark gray color. This is due to the very low content of visible photons in the emitted-reflected "light beams" in general. Although some their number is still contained, which explains the presence at least of gray color at substances. And besides that, the gray colors in the twilight are not quite gray. Substances are characterized by a subtle hue, which is well evident at higher irradiance. The degree of color discrimination is determined by the intensity of the falling "light".
But, in addition to the gray color that appears at dusk the gray color exists independently - ie it manifests itself irrespective of the level of illumination.
The chemical element will be painted in gray: 1) first, if  the areas with "bare" visible photons of a certain color initially are not present at its periphery that does not allow to create any color sensation (note that the same thing happens in the case the emergence of color of both white and black colors); 2) secondly, very few zones with the Fields of Attraction are present in the external manifestation of the quality of such elements and the magnitude of these Fields is not sufficient, which is the reason for the weak accumulation of elementary particles (including visible photons). Therefore, in the emitted-reflected "light rays" of such elements there is no predominance of visible photons of any quality that are able to create a visual sensation of any color. And in addition, in an emitted-reflected ray there are very few of accumulated free visible photons.
We can assume that the gray color is a light tone of black color. I.e. a zero coloration together with the emission of a small amount of accumulated visible photons. 

воскресенье, 19 марта 2017 г.



Surely you noticed that things for a long time exposed to intense solar radiation “lose color”. “Loss of color” means that the tone of things’ color becomes lighter.  Used in everyday life bleaching agents have exactly the same effect on the color of things. What happens in this case with the chemical elements of the bleached substances?
If we explain what is happening in a nutshell, then everything is very simple - excess amount of free elementary particles are accumulated on the surface of chemical elements. And among these elementary particles there are many visible photons of all colors.    
Let’s, at first, consider the mechanism of “loss of color” on the example of the action of solar radiation.
The solar particles emitted by the Sun moving by inertia reach the planets. They continue their movement. Herewith they are attracted by elements of the atmosphere, through which they move. Chemical elements of the atmosphere accumulate free particles on their surface. Further these particles descend towards the center of the planet, moving from element to element on their surface.
Thus, elements of all substances on the surface accumulate free particles in two ways. Either those particles are accumulated that inertially move in the composition of a light ray and directly collide with these elements. Or those particles are accumulated, which move from element to element, flowing down.  
So, when the elements of some substance accumulate particles, directly meeting their flow, experiencing a collision with them, then they accumulate much more particles (including visible photons), if when they accumulate particles moving from element to element.
That's why, when substances are exposed to direct sunlight (in a hot climate and in the hot season), they accumulate on their surface excessive amount of free particles and therefore of visible photons of all colors. As result, there occurs color clarification of this substance. The mechanism of color clarification is described in detail in the article “Light and dark color tones (when the intensity of the falling light changes)”.
 Bleaching agents work similarly. Chlorine-containing compounds and hydrogen peroxide are the most used among them. The active component in the composition of chlorine bleaches is chlorine. In the composition of hydrogen peroxide the element that responsible for bleaching is oxygen.  
As known, oxygen percentage in the composition of peroxide is higher compared to water. The elements and chlorine, and oxygen are very active oxidants. The fact that they are located in the upper periods indicates to us that they have in the structure of their nuclei less particles with gravity fields, than elements of the lower lying periods. And that fact that and oxygen and chlorine under normal conditions are in a gaseous state indicates to us that in their composition there are many particles with repulsion fields.
The characteristic feature of both types of elements is the presence in the composition of their surface layers a significant number of particles of two colors – blue and red.
As we have already learned, not only visible photons can belong to one of the three primary colors. Particles of any level of any Plan have in their composition the particles of the three primary colors (blue, yellow and red).
So, the particles of red and blue colors in the surface layers of elements – this is primarily IR and radio photons. Exactly the particles of blue color are responsible for the existence of areas in the elements on their surface, where the Field Attraction outwardly manifests, herewith sufficient in magnitude for accumulation there of sufficient number of free particles.
Elements of chlorine have the higher total percentage of such zones than elements of oxygen. That is why any chlorine element always accumulates more free particles than any element of oxygen. Due to the fact that the magnitude of Attractive Fields and in oxygen, and in chlorine is incomparably more than in any metal element, they very good give away the accumulated particles to the elements with more pronounced metallic properties. This is precisely their "oxidizing ability". Elements of chlorine are always stronger oxidants, than oxygen elements. Among the accumulated free particles there are many visible photons of all colors. When oxygen or chlorine in the composition of bleachers contacts with elements of bleached substances, they give them their accumulated particles.
As a result, an excessive number of visible photons appears on the surface of the elements in the composition of the bleached substances.  This leads to the lightening the color tones of substance. The mechanism of lightening is absolutely the same as in the case of action of sunlight.


суббота, 11 марта 2017 г.



Besides the fact that any colors change their tone in response to a change of intensity of the falling radiation, there are colors initially with a lighter tone and colors of darker tone.
So, there are substances having the same color. But in this case the given color of some substances has a lighter shade, and others - a darker. Why so? And that is why.  

If two substances - one of which is a lighter colored and other is a darker colored - have the same color - this fact indicates that their periphery has the same qualitative and quantitative composition of visible photons. 
However, the chemical elements responsible for color of these substances have different external manifestations of quality - i.e. the common qualitative and quantitative composition of these elements will be different. And as a consequence - Force fields of these elements will be different.  

As we said in the article "The coloration of the bodies" Force fields of chemical elements may constitute the Fields of Attraction, Fields of Repulsion or be neutral. And the magnitude of these fields can be different. Besides a separately taken element as part of the Force Field can have sections of different qualities. For example somewhere may manifest the Field of Attraction of one magnitude and on other areas of the surface - of other value.
So here the chemical elements of the lighter colored substance will have a magnitude of the Attractive Field on the areas accumulating free particles more than the elements of the darker substance. Just the sections with large Fields of Attraction accumulate free particles.  The visible photons of all colors are present among these free particles and emitting during collisions they totally  give light (white) color.   The visible photons determining the common color of chemical elements of this substance are emitted by those areas of the chemical elements, where the Force Field is neutral or its magnitude is not large, because of what small amount of free particles are accumulated on these sections (or they are not accumulated at all). Taken together visible photons giving a total color together with the visible photons of all colors determine this or that tone (light or dark) of the total color. 
Here I want to draw your attention to the next moment. If the magnitude of the Attractive Fields on those sections, which accumulate the free particles in great numbers,  is too great,  then the given substance will have not light shade of some color. No, it will be already a metal having a given color and It will be characterized by a metallic luster.  This is explained by the fact that the said sections accumulating a lot of free particles emit poorly the accumulated particles in collisions with them the bombarding luminous flux. Thus, only reflected visible photons remain mainly in the reflectivity-emitted light beam.
White color that is inherent from the beginning for the elements of one or another  substance represents thus an extreme case of light tone of any coloration. The white color tells us that the entire surface of the chemical elements accumulates a sufficient amount of free particles, among which there are a lot of visible photons  of all colors, which will be emitted at falling on them of bombarding particles. Herewith,  in the composition of surface layers there are very little  number of areas (or not at all), which doesn't accumulate free particles and in the composition of which there are visible photons.  
And in general, there are many very light, almost white variants of color, which yet aren't absolutely white. They have a small almost indistinguishable tint of one or another color, created by emitted photons accumulated on the periphery of elements of this substance.
As for the elements of the dark-colored substance the same color as the light-colored, which was mentioned before, they have on those sections, which accumulate free particles, less Fields of Attractions, than the elements of the light-colored substance. Because of this they can emit less visible photons (accumulated in the composition of free particles) in response to the falling on them of bombarding particles.
As a result such element contains less accumulated visible photons in response to the falling on it of elementary particles in the composition of reflected-emitted light ray.  
I.e. the total light rays emitted by this element are less diluted by visible photons of all colors and the color does not seem so light. The less the Fields of Attraction of elements of substance, the less in the light ray the number of visible photons of all colors, the darker will be the tone of this light ray and correspondingly the coloration of this substance.
Black color as well as white is another one last variant of coloration of substances elements. White color is due to prevalence of visible photons of all colors among the emitted photons because of the larger magnitude of Attractive Field of the elements of this substance. And black color – this is somewhat zero coloration. And this variant is determined: at first, by the sufficiently small magnitude of the element’s Attractive Field, because of what free particles practically do not accumulate on the surface of the element. And secondly, this is because of absence on its periphery of visible photons of some particular color generally. As a result, in response to the fall on this element of elementary particles any visible photons aren’t emitted.
Metallic luster – this is an extreme case of light coloration of elements. The Field of Attraction of the metal element is so great that the element in response to the fall of elementary particles emits very little even of accumulated optical photons. I.e. there occurs mainly only the reflection of the falling visible photons. Hence the ability of a number of metals especially in polished form to reflect in unchanged qualitative and quantitative composition.

Thus, we can sum up a little and make a general conclusion: the chemical elements of substances colored darker (where an extreme case is black color) summarily have the less Fields of Attraction than colored lighter (where an extreme case is white color.